diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'README.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
@@ -189,13 +189,13 @@ There are only a few places where this spec says things that contradict the canonical syntax description: - It [allows all punctuation symbols to be - backslash-escaped](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#backslash-escapes), + backslash-escaped](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#backslash-escapes), not just the symbols with special meanings in Markdown. I found that it was just too hard to remember which symbols could be escaped. - It introduces an [alternative syntax for hard line - breaks](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#hard-line-breaks), a + breaks](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#hard-line-breaks), a backslash at the end of the line, supplementing the two-spaces-at-the-end-of-line rule. This is motivated by persistent complaints about the “invisible” nature of the two-space rule. @@ -205,11 +205,11 @@ the canonical syntax description: quotes around a title in inline links, but not in reference links. This kind of difference is really hard for users to remember, so the spec [allows single quotes in both - contexts](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#links). + contexts](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#links). - The rule for HTML blocks differs, though in most real cases it shouldn't make a difference. (See - [here](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#html-blocks) for + [here](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#html-blocks) for details.) The spec's proposal makes it easy to include Markdown inside HTML block-level tags, if you want to, but also allows you to exclude this. It is also makes parsing much easier, avoiding @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ the canonical syntax description: - Rules for content in lists differ in a few respects, though (as with HTML blocks), most lists in existing documents should render as intended. There is some discussion of the choice points and - differences [here](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#motivation). + differences [here](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#motivation). I think that the spec's proposal does better than any existing implementation in rendering lists the way a human writer or reader would intuitively understand them. (I could give numerous examples @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ the canonical syntax description: - The start number of an ordered list is significant. -- [Fenced code blocks](http://jgm.github.io/stmd/spec.html#fenced-code-blocks) are supported, delimited by either +- [Fenced code blocks](http://jgm.github.io/CommonMark/spec.html#fenced-code-blocks) are supported, delimited by either backticks (` ``` `) or tildes (` ~~~ `). In all of this, I have been guided by eight years experience writing @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ Contributing There is a [forum for discussing CommonMark](http://talk.commonmark.org); you should use it instead of github issues for questions and possibly open-ended discussions. -Use the [github issue tracker](http://github.com/jgm/stmd/issues) +Use the [github issue tracker](http://github.com/jgm/CommonMark/issues) only for simple, clear, actionable issues. |