diff options
author | John MacFarlane <fiddlosopher@gmail.com> | 2014-10-24 11:42:53 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | John MacFarlane <fiddlosopher@gmail.com> | 2014-10-24 11:42:53 -0700 |
commit | 136a0df633a4ff3e68f815b57d2249c48aea1a86 (patch) | |
tree | 221bb0238b3340ac5734926fbc216e6ad3de8d96 /spec.txt | |
parent | c15a7cef25ef6ad3c03fb5c1bd85083b1230d92a (diff) |
More tweaks on emph/strong spec and tests.
Diffstat (limited to 'spec.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | spec.txt | 26 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
@@ -4117,10 +4117,13 @@ the following principles resolve ambiguity: 12. An interpretation `<strong><em>...</em></strong>` is always preferred to `<em><strong>..</strong></em>`. -13. When two potential emphasis or strong emphasis spans overlap, - the first takes precedence. Thus, for example, `*foo _bar* baz_` +13. Earlier closings are preferred to later closings. Thus, + when two potential emphasis or strong emphasis spans overlap, + the first takes precedence: for example, `*foo _bar* baz_` is parsed as `<em>foo _bar</em> baz_` rather than - `*foo <em>bar* baz</em>`. + `*foo <em>bar* baz</em>`. For the same reason, + `**foo*bar**` is parsed as `<em><em>foo</em>bar</em>*` + rather than `<strong>foo*bar</strong>`. 14. Inline code spans, links, images, and HTML tags group more tightly than emphasis. So, when there is a choice between an interpretation @@ -4707,15 +4710,6 @@ We retain symmetry in these cases: <p><em><em>foo</em> bar</em></p> . -Note that this is not a case of strong emphasis, -since the interior `*` closes regular emphasis: - -. -**foo bar* baz** -. -<p><em><em>foo bar</em> baz</em>*</p> -. - More cases with mismatched delimiters: . @@ -4748,7 +4742,7 @@ More cases with mismatched delimiters: <p>***foo <em>bar</em></p> . -The following case illustrates rule 13: +The following cases illustrate rule 13: . *foo _bar* baz_ @@ -4756,6 +4750,12 @@ The following case illustrates rule 13: <p><em>foo _bar</em> baz_</p> . +. +**foo bar* baz** +. +<p><em><em>foo bar</em> baz</em>*</p> +. + The following cases illustrate rule 14: . |