diff options
author | John MacFarlane <jgm@berkeley.edu> | 2015-06-18 12:32:37 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | John MacFarlane <jgm@berkeley.edu> | 2015-06-18 12:32:37 -0700 |
commit | 2f945071616d226296068e3c61b6de2e64c813cf (patch) | |
tree | f4adadb23fa8e1e9b430d29309ac0bcdde6f88b3 /algorithm.md | |
parent | 04f9b7d03ea9a79f8b6f9a35deb4d703d80870f3 (diff) |
Added algorithm.md, informal explanation of emph/link parsing.
Diffstat (limited to 'algorithm.md')
-rw-r--r-- | algorithm.md | 116 |
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/algorithm.md b/algorithm.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..88fe96e --- /dev/null +++ b/algorithm.md @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ +Algorithm for parsing nested links, images, emphasis, and quotes +================================================================ + +When we're parsing inlines and we hit + +- a run of `*` or `_` characters +- a `[` or `![` + +we insert a text node with the literal content, and add a pointer +to this text node to the **delimiter stack.** + +The **delimiter stack** is a doubly linked list. Each +element contains a pointer to a text node, plus information about + +- the type of delimiter (`[`, `![`, `*`, `_`) +- the number of delimiters, +- whether the delimiter is "active" (all are active to start), and +- whether the delimiter is a potential opener, a potential closer, + or both. + +When we hit a `]` character, we call the `look_for_link_or_image` +procedure (see below). + +When we hit the end of the input, we call the `process_emphasis` +procedure (see below), with `stack_bottom` = NULL. + +`look_for_link_or_image` +------------------------ + +Starting at the top of the delimiter stack, we look backwards +through the stack for a `[` or `![` delimiter. + +If we don't find one, we return a literal text node `]`. + +If we do find one, but it's not *active*, we remove the inactive +delimiter from the stack, and return a literal text node `]`. + +If we find one and it's active, then we parse ahead to see if +we have an inline link/image, reference link/image, compact reference +link/image, or shortcut reference link/image. + +If we don't, then we remove the `[` or `![` delimiter from the +delimiter stack and return a literal text node `]`. + +If we do, then + +- We return a link or image node whose children are the inlines + after the text node pointed to by the opening delimiter. + +- We run `process_emphasis` on these inlines, with the `[` opener + as `stack_bottom`. + +- We remove the opening delimiter. + +- If we have a link (and not an image), we also set all + `[` delimiters before the opening delimiter to *inactive*. (This + will prevent us from getting links within links.) + + +`process_emphasis` +------------------ + +Parameter `stack_bottom` sets a lower bound to how far we +descend in the **delimiter stack**. If it is NULL, we can +go all the way to the bottom. Otherwise, we stop before +visiting `stack_bottom`. + +Let `current_position` point to the element on the delimiter +just above `stack_bottom` (or the first element if `stack_bottom` +is NULL). + +We keep track of the `openers_bottom` for each delimiter +type (`*`, `_`). Initialize this to `stack_bottom`. + +Then we repeat the following until we run out of potential +closers: + +- Move `current_position` forward in the delimiter stack (if needed) + until we find the first potential closer with delimiter `*` or `_`. + (This will be the potential closer closest + to the beginning of the input -- the first one in parse order.) + +- Now, look back in the stack (staying above `stack_bottom` and + the `openers_bottom` for this delimiter type) for the + first matching potential opener ("matching" means same delimiter). + +- If one is found: + + - Figure out whether we have emphasis or strong emphasis: + if both closer and opener spans have length >= 2, we have + strong, otherwise regular. + - Insert an emph or strong emph node accordingly, after + the text node corresponding to the opener. + - Remove delimiters between opener and closer from the delimiter + stack. + - Remove 1 (for regular emph) or 2 (for strong emph) delimiters + from the opening and closing text nodes. If they become empty + as a result, remove them and remove the corresponding element + of the delimiter stack. If the closing node is removed, reset + `current_position` to the next element in the stack. + +- If none in found: + + - Set `openers_bottom` to the element before `current_position`. + (We know that there are no openers for this kind of closer up to and + including this point, so this puts a lower bound on future searches.) + - If the closer at `current_position` is not a potential opener, + remove it from the delimiter stack (since we know it can't + be a closer either). + - Advance `current_position` to the next element in the stack. + +- Repeat. + +- After we're done, remove all delimiters above `stack_bottom` from the + delimiter stack. + |