diff options
author | John MacFarlane <jgm@berkeley.edu> | 2015-01-12 21:09:17 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | John MacFarlane <jgm@berkeley.edu> | 2015-01-12 21:09:17 -0800 |
commit | 47d27c2763599af741e2c4fa30cea15fe2990d29 (patch) | |
tree | ef4e5cf8c97e480a5faca03456ea13e3e3e2dd50 /README.md | |
parent | de451d06eeb9c1e66352e9e9ad367a95b1cd1d1f (diff) |
Improved README.
Diffstat (limited to 'README.md')
-rw-r--r-- | README.md | 72 |
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 32 deletions
@@ -19,8 +19,7 @@ It is easy to use `libcmark` in python, lua, ruby, and other dynamic languages: see the `wrappers/` subdirectory for some simple examples. The JavaScript implementation is a single JavaScript file, with -no dependencies, that can be linked to in an HTML page. Here -is a simple usage example: +no dependencies, that can be linked into an HTML page. ``` javascript var reader = new commonmark.DocParser(); @@ -29,9 +28,6 @@ var parsed = reader.parse("Hello *world*"); var result = writer.render(parsed); ``` -A node package is also available (`npm install commonmark`). It includes -a command-line tool called `commonmark`. - **A note on security:** Neither implementation attempts to sanitize link attributes or raw HTML. If you use these libraries in applications that accept @@ -74,21 +70,26 @@ Or, to create Xcode project files on OSX: make install The GNU Makefile also provides a few other targets for developers. +To run a benchmark: + + make bench + To run a "fuzz test" against ten long randomly generated inputs: make fuzztest -To run a test for memory leaks using valgrind: +To run a test for memory leaks using `valgrind`: make leakcheck +To reformat source code using `astyle`: + + make astyle + To make a release tarball and zip archive: make archive -To test the archives: - - make testarchive Compiling for Windows --------------------- @@ -111,20 +112,29 @@ The JavaScript library can be installed through `npm`: npm install commonmark -To build the JavaScript library as a single standalone file: +This includes a command-line converter called `commonmark`. - browserify --standalone commonmark js/lib/index.js -o js/commonmark.js - -Or fetch a pre-built copy from +If you want to use it in a client application, you can fetch +a pre-built copy of `commonmark.js` from <http://spec.commonmark.org/js/commonmark.js>. +Or, to build it (this requires `browserify`): + + make js/commonmark.js + To run tests for the JavaScript library: make testjs -or +To run benchmarks against some other JavaScript converters: + + npm install showdown marked markdown-it + make benchjs + +To start an interactive dingus that you can use to try out +the library: - node js/test.js + make dingus The spec -------- @@ -132,12 +142,12 @@ The spec [The spec] contains over 500 embedded examples which serve as conformance tests. To run the tests using an executable `$PROG`: - python test/spec_tests.py --program $PROG + python3 test/spec_tests.py --program $PROG If you want to extract the raw test data from the spec without actually running the tests, you can do: - python test/spec_tests.py --dump-tests + python3 test/spec_tests.py --dump-tests and you'll get all the tests in JSON format. @@ -153,8 +163,9 @@ file, with code examples written in a shorthand form: . To build an HTML version of the spec, do `make spec.html`. To build a -PDF version, do `make spec.pdf`. Both these commands require that -[pandoc] is installed, and creating a PDF requires a latex installation. +PDF version, do `make spec.pdf`. (Creating a PDF requires [pandoc] +and a LaTeX installation. Creating the HTML version requires only +`libcmark` and `python3`.) The spec is written from the point of view of the human writer, not the computer reader. It is not an algorithm---an English translation of @@ -190,15 +201,13 @@ Differences from original Markdown There are only a few places where this spec says things that contradict the canonical syntax description: -- It [allows all punctuation symbols to be - backslash-escaped](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#backslash-escapes), +- It allows all punctuation symbols to be backslash-escaped, not just the symbols with special meanings in Markdown. We found that it was just too hard to remember which symbols could be escaped. -- It introduces an [alternative syntax for hard line - breaks](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#hard-line-breaks), a - backslash at the end of the line, supplementing the +- It introduces an alternative syntax for hard line + breaks, a backslash at the end of the line, supplementing the two-spaces-at-the-end-of-line rule. This is motivated by persistent complaints about the “invisible” nature of the two-space rule. @@ -206,13 +215,11 @@ the canonical syntax description: backwards-compatible way). For example, `Markdown.pl` allows single quotes around a title in inline links, but not in reference links. This kind of difference is really hard for users to remember, so the - spec [allows single quotes in both - contexts](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#links). + spec allows single quotes in both contexts. - The rule for HTML blocks differs, though in most real cases it - shouldn't make a difference. (See - [here](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#html-blocks) for - details.) The spec's proposal makes it easy to include Markdown + shouldn't make a difference. (See the section on HTML Blocks + for details.) The spec's proposal makes it easy to include Markdown inside HTML block-level tags, if you want to, but also allows you to exclude this. It is also makes parsing much easier, avoiding expensive backtracking. @@ -231,7 +238,7 @@ the canonical syntax description: - Rules for content in lists differ in a few respects, though (as with HTML blocks), most lists in existing documents should render as intended. There is some discussion of the choice points and - differences [here](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#motivation). + differences in the subsection of List Items entitled Motivation. We think that the spec's proposal does better than any existing implementation in rendering lists the way a human writer or reader would intuitively understand them. (We could give numerous examples @@ -253,7 +260,7 @@ the canonical syntax description: - The start number of an ordered list is significant. -- [Fenced code blocks](http://spec.commonmark.org/0.13/#fenced-code-blocks) are supported, delimited by either +- Fenced code blocks are supported, delimited by either backticks (```` ``` ```` or tildes (` ~~~ `). Contributing @@ -289,7 +296,8 @@ optimized the C implementation for performance, increasing its speed tenfold. Kārlis Gaņģis helped work out a better parsing algorithm for links and emphasis, eliminating several worst-case performance issues. Nick Wellnhofer contributed many improvements, including -most of the C library's API and its test harness. +most of the C library's API and its test harness. Vitaly Puzrin +has offered much good advice about the JavaScript implementation. [cmake]: http://www.cmake.org/download/ [pandoc]: http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/ |