diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/spec.txt | 64 |
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/test/spec.txt b/test/spec.txt index 418fa59..8b29c56 100644 --- a/test/spec.txt +++ b/test/spec.txt @@ -3621,7 +3621,10 @@ An [ordered list marker](@) is a sequence of 1--9 arabic digits (`0-9`), followed by either a `.` character or a `)` character. (The reason for the length limit is that with 10 digits we start seeing integer overflows -in some browsers.) +in some browsers.) Exception: In cases where ordered list markers +interrupt paragraphs---that is, when they occur on a line +that would otherwise count as [paragraph continuation +text]---only `1.` and `1)` are allowed. The following rules define [list items]: @@ -4853,28 +4856,20 @@ Foo </ul> ```````````````````````````````` - `Markdown.pl` does not allow this, through fear of triggering a list via a numeral in a hard-wrapped line: -```````````````````````````````` example +```````````````````````````````` markdown The number of windows in my house is 14. The number of doors is 6. -. -<p>The number of windows in my house is</p> -<ol start="14"> -<li>The number of doors is 6.</li> -</ol> ```````````````````````````````` +Oddly, though, `Markdown.pl` *does* allow a blockquote to +interrupt a paragraph, even though the same considerations might +apply. - -Oddly, `Markdown.pl` *does* allow a blockquote to interrupt a paragraph, -even though the same considerations might apply. We think that the two -cases should be treated the same. Here are two reasons for allowing -lists to interrupt paragraphs: - -First, it is natural and not uncommon for people to start lists without -blank lines: +In CommonMark, we do allow lists to interrupt paragraphs, for +two reasons. First, it is natural and not uncommon for people +to start lists without blank lines: I need to buy - new shoes @@ -4908,17 +4903,38 @@ then by itself should be a paragraph followed by a nested sublist. -Our adherence to the [principle of uniformity] -thus inclines us to think that there are two coherent packages: +Since it is well established Markdown practice to allow lists to +interrupt paragraphs inside list items, the [principle of +uniformity] requires us to allow this outside list items as +well. ([reStructuredText](http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html) +takes a different approach, requiring blank lines before lists +even inside other list items.) -1. Require blank lines before *all* lists and blockquotes, - including lists that occur as sublists inside other list items. +In order to solve of unwanted lists in paragraphs with +hard-wrapped numerals, we allow only lists starting with `1` to +interrupt paragraphs. Thus, -2. Require blank lines in none of these places. +```````````````````````````````` example +The number of windows in my house is +14. The number of doors is 6. +. +<p>The number of windows in my house is +14. The number of doors is 6.</p> +```````````````````````````````` + +We may still get an unintended result in cases like + +```````````````````````````````` example +The number of windows in my house is +1. The number of doors is 6. +. +<p>The number of windows in my house is</p> +<ol> +<li>The number of doors is 6.</li> +</ol> +```````````````````````````````` -[reStructuredText](http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html) takes -the first approach, for which there is much to be said. But the second -seems more consistent with established practice with Markdown. +but this rule should prevent most spurious list captures. There can be blank lines between items, but two blank lines end a list: |